Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Simon Riggs
Тема
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Дата
в 02:46:37
Msg-id
1274160355.28911.1585.camel@ebony
Ответ на
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) (Fujii Masao)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> 
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:40 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> ISTM that walreceiver might be invoked even after shutdown is
> requested. We should prevent the postmaster from starting up
> walreceiver if Shutdown > NoShutdown?

+1

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
FAQ