Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Simon Riggs
Тема
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Дата
в 08:15:44
Msg-id
1274094899.28911.571.camel@ebony
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 06:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> > I think we should review Masao's patch and ask him to make any changes
> > we think are appropriate. There's no benefit to have multiple patch
> > authors at one time.
> 
> I did review his patch.  It duplicates a few lines of logic and I
> found a way to avoid that, so I proposed it.  That seems totally
> normal to me and I'm not sure what you're concerned about.

I think we should concentrate efforts on just one patch: Masao's.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
FAQ