On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> (2)
>>>>> pg_ctl -ms stop emits the following warning whenever there is the
>>>>> backup_label file in $PGDATA.
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: online backup mode is active
>>>>> Shutdown will not complete until pg_stop_backup() is called.
>>>>>
>>>>> This warning doesn't fit in with the shutdown during recovery case.
>>>>> Since smart shutdown might be requested by other than pg_ctl, the
>>>>> warning should be emitted in server side rather than client, I think.
>>>>> How about moving the warning to the server side?
>>>
>>> Though I'm not sure if this should be fixed for 9.0, I attached the
>>> patch (move_bkp_cancel_warning_v1.patch).
>>
>> This patch is worth applying for 9.0? If not, I'll add it into
>> the next CF for 9.1.
>
> I'm not convinced that this is a good idea, because ISTM it will make
> the error message to be less likely to be seen by the person running
> pg_ctl. In any case, it's a behavior change, so I think that means
> it's a no-go for 9.0.
>
> In terms of 9.1, it might make sense to log something to both places.
> But maybe we shouldn't just do it once - maybe it should happen every
> 30 s or so until we actually manage to shut down, with a list of
> what's still blocking shutdown a la errdetail_busy_db.
Fair enough. I'll think of the issue in detail again for 9.1.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center