Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTincIQW-wK93ch9kN5DVEndVlmAfjNg052NBe996@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In terms of removing the backup label file, can we simply have an
>> additional boolean in the postmaster that indicates whether we've ever
>> reached PM_RUN, and only consider removing the backup file if so?
>
> Yes, but I prefer XLogCtl->SharedRecoveryInProgress, which is the almost
> same indicator as the boolean you suggested. Thought?

It feels cleaner and simpler to me to use the information that the
postmaster already collects rather than having it take locks and check
shared memory, but I might be wrong.  Why do you prefer doing it that
way?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronous replication patch built on SR
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta