Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikdSNUOYpYcs6FPLUApUCT-cg2H5P1BiK9G-Jsw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks pretty reasonable to me, but I guess I feel like it would
> be better to drive the CancelBackup() decision off of whether we've
> ever reached PM_RUN rather than consulting XLogCtl.  It just feels
> cleaner to me to drive all of the postmaster decisions off of the same
> signalling mechanism rather than having a separate one (that only
> works because it's used very late in shutdown when we theoretically
> don't need a lock) just for this one case.

Okay, how about the attached patch? It uses the postmaster-local flag
"ReachedEndOfRecovery" (better name?) instead of XLogCtl one.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)