Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Jonathan S. Katz
Тема
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id
a47ea348-b9a0-02b7-5bcb-7a32143dd16f@postgresql.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
On 4/26/20 3:21 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 4/26/20 1:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> 
>> There is a small problem with getting this to work in the webstyle
>> HTML: somebody decided it would be a great idea to have a global
>> override on paragraph margin-bottom settings.  For the purposes of
>> this test I just deleted that from main.css, but I suppose we want
>> some more-nuanced solution in reality.
> 
> I have to see why that is. I traced it back to the original "bring doc
> styles up to modern website" patch (66798351) and there is missing
> context. Anyway, I'd like to test it before a wholesale removal (there
> is often a strong correlation between "!important" and "hack", so I'll
> want to further dive into it).
> 
> I'll have some time to play around with the CSS tonight.

Can you try

 #docContent p {
-  margin-bottom: 1rem !important;
+  margin-bottom: 1rem;
 }

and see how it looks?

Jonathan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: doc review for v13
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
FAQ