Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
>> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.

> I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
> readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
> problem, I withdraw that suggestion.

Cool, then we're all on the same page.  I shall press forward.

            regards, tom lane