Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZdX2nhx6YgkegeN3SQzj9GYQoDqQE8sxD7sGpTkZyXbw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.

I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
problem, I withdraw that suggestion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: return value from pq_putmessage() is widely ignored