Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.2004140714090.27777@pseudo
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello Tom,

> Before I spend more time on this, I want to make sure that people
> are happy with this line of attack.

+1

I like it this way, because the structure is quite readable, which is the 
point.

My 0.02€:

Maybe column heander "Example Result" should be simply "Result", because 
it is already on the same line as "Example" on its left, and "Example | 
Example Result" looks redundant.

Maybe the signature and description lines could be exchanged: I'm more 
interested and the description first, and the signature just above the 
example would make sense.

I'm wondering whether the function/operator name should be vertically 
centered in its cell? I'd left it left justified.

-- 
Fabien.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: variation of row_number with parallel
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates