Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonathan S. Katz
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id b1f89d14-cd7f-e43d-964e-9fb04e209b72@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 4/29/20 11:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Clearly I was caught doing a single browser test (Chrome).
>
> Well, I've not tested anything but Safari, either ...
>
>> Reverted back to the verbose way sans !important, attached, which
>> appears to be the consensus. If you can ACK this, I'll commit.
>
> This one works for me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Jonathan
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andy Fan
Дата:
Сообщение: Can we remove the other_rels_list parameter for make_rels_by_clause_joins
Следующее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: shared-memory based stats collector