Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id 20157.1587401360@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> writes:
> While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with
> operators.

BTW, I think a big part of the problem with table 9.4 as it's being
rendered in the web style right now is that the type placeholders
(numeric_type etc) are being rendered in a ridiculously overemphasized
fashion, causing them to overwhelm all else.  Do we really want
<replaceable> to be rendered that way?  I'd think plain italic,
comparable to the rendering of <parameter>, would be more appropriate.

I could make this page use <parameter> for that purpose of course,
but it seems like semantically the wrong thing.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More efficient RI checks - take 2
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations