Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Victor Yegorov
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id CAGnEbohsoL80JCUTaR6Pp1_pTHper7c6yWVvYU16nYzcPkqTQQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
вс, 19 апр. 2020 г. в 20:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
In the meantime I plan to push forward with the markup approach we've
got.  The editorial content should still work if we find a better
markup answer, and I'm willing to do the work of replacing the markup
as long as somebody else figures out what it should be.

I am following this thread as a frequent documentation user.

While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with operators.
Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on. Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but still) to find the operator.
 
--
Victor Yegorov

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls
Следующее
От: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow pg_read_all_stats to read pg_stat_progress_*