Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonathan S. Katz
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id b998a672-2525-1cba-ac64-b292f495919e@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/27/20 8:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older
>> versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is
>> ready.
>
> Other than that point, the main.css patch as I presented it just adds
> some rules that aren't used yet, so it could be pushed as soon as you're
> satisfied about the !important change.  It'd probably make sense to
> push it in advance of making the markup changes, so we don't have an
> interval of near-unreadable devel docs.

*nods* I'll ensure to test again and hopefully commit later today.

I forget what I was looking at, but I did see a similar pattern in some
other modern software docs, so it seems like this is trending in the
right direction. Looking forward to the rollout!

Jonathan


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Следующее
От: Prabhat Sahu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables