Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id 5651.1587991781@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older
> versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is
> ready.

Other than that point, the main.css patch as I presented it just adds
some rules that aren't used yet, so it could be pushed as soon as you're
satisfied about the !important change.  It'd probably make sense to
push it in advance of making the markup changes, so we don't have an
interval of near-unreadable devel docs.

Still waiting to hear whether this markup approach satisfies
Peter's concerns, though.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays
Следующее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?