Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaTwhEH88qM8XQ3tSS23+XH7MjYaQj99sQqLGnERexzeg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Glad you like 'em ;-).  Do you have an opinion about what to do
> with the operator tables --- ie do we need a column with the operator
> name at the left?

Well, if the first row says date + date -> date, then I don't think we
also need another column to say that we're talking about +

Seems redundant.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Split interval (used by nbtree suffix truncation) and posting list tuples
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?