Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQLd45w92YbhvN5q0xQYbsU9RwJLaaGpN1095e6EBTTmQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> 4. Arguable RLS security bug, EvalPlanQual() paranoia - This seems
>> like another question of what the expectations around RLS actually
>> are.
>
> In the end that's minor from the end user's perspective.

I think that depends on what we ultimately decide to do about it,
which is something that I have yet to form an opinion on (although I
know we need to document the issue, at the very least). For example,
one idea that Stephen and I discussed privately was making security
barrier quals referencing other relations lock the referenced rows.
This was an informal throwing around of ideas, but it's possible that
something like that could end up happening.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1