Re: remaining sql/json patches
| От | Amit Langote |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+HiwqGGqJ=vjRr1Y_8KRc9ZtabaLwxEhEGHCRXnr1UTw1o-7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: remaining sql/json patches (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 5:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> 28.06.2024 09:15, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the report. Yeah, those comments that got added in
> > 7081ac46ace are obsolete.
> >
>
> Thanks for paying attention to that!
>
> Could you also look at comments for transformJsonObjectAgg() and
> transformJsonArrayAgg(), aren't they obsolete too?
You're right. I didn't think they needed to be similarly fixed,
because I noticed the code like the following in in
transformJsonObjectAgg() which sets the OID of the function to call
from, again, JsonConstructorExpr:
{
if (agg->absent_on_null)
if (agg->unique)
aggfnoid = F_JSONB_OBJECT_AGG_UNIQUE_STRICT;
else
aggfnoid = F_JSONB_OBJECT_AGG_STRICT;
else if (agg->unique)
aggfnoid = F_JSONB_OBJECT_AGG_UNIQUE;
else
aggfnoid = F_JSONB_OBJECT_AGG;
aggtype = JSONBOID;
}
So, yes, the comments for them should be fixed too like the other two
to also mention JsonConstructorExpr.
Updated patch attached.
Wonder if Alvaro has any thoughts on this.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: