Re: remaining sql/json patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От jian he
Тема Re: remaining sql/json patches
Дата
Msg-id CACJufxFkwAQ4HcQrvyM4X22zCE3C3C88D028nO1gJzENLYSMew@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remaining sql/json patches  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: remaining sql/json patches  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Re: remaining sql/json patches  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:30 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:57 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please let me know if you have further comments on 0001.  I'd like to
> > get that in before spending more energy on 0002.
> >

-- a/src/backend/parser/parse_target.c
+++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_target.c
@@ -2019,6 +2019,9 @@ FigureColnameInternal(Node *node, char **name)
  case JSON_VALUE_OP:
  *name = "json_value";
  return 2;
+ case JSON_TABLE_OP:
+ *name = "json_table";
+ return 2;
  default:
  elog(ERROR, "unrecognized JsonExpr op: %d",
  (int) ((JsonFuncExpr *) node)->op);

"case JSON_TABLE_OP part", no need?
json_table output must provide column name and type?

I did some minor refactor transformJsonTableColumns, make the comments
align with the function intention.
in v48-0001, in transformJsonTableColumns we can `Assert(rawc->name);`.
since non-nested JsonTableColumn must specify column name.
in v48-0002, we can change to `if (rawc->coltype != JTC_NESTED)
Assert(rawc->name);`



SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE(jsonb '1', '$' COLUMNS (a int PATH '$.a' )
ERROR ON ERROR) jt;
ERROR:  no SQL/JSON item

I thought it should just return NULL.
In this case, I thought that
(not column-level) ERROR ON ERROR should not interfere with "COLUMNS
(a int PATH '$.a' )".

+-- Other miscellanous checks
"miscellanous" should be "miscellaneous".


overall the coverage is pretty high.
the current test output looks fine.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Следующее
От: walther@technowledgy.de
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions