Re: remaining sql/json patches

I forgot to add:

* 0001 looks an obvious improvement.  You could just push it now, to
avoid carrying it forward anymore.  I would just put the constructName
ahead of value expr in the argument list, though.

* 0002: I have no idea what this is (though I probably should).  I would
also push it right away -- if anything, so that we figure out sooner
that it was actually needed in the first place.  Or maybe you just need
the right test cases?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/