Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas

Then wouldn't it be more appropriate to ask:

What's the status of the things listed on the PostgreSQL gotchas.   
Are they bugs?  Are they valid?  Have the been resolved?  What does  
the community thing of those gotchas?

I personally don't take an open ended question like "URL: Any  
comments?" as trying to be productive.  But I could also just be  
burnt out on the whole PgSQL vs MySQL flame war or reading too much  
into what I appraised to be terse email.  If so I apologize.

Regards,

Gavin

On Oct 6, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Aly S.P Dharshi wrote:

> No flamewar here, I am just trying to see if opinions of others on  
> this, as Jim had posted a MySQL one, and that there was a  
> PostgreSQL one, so I wanted to see if these are valid, if they  
> aren't then that site should be updated to reflect this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aly.
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
>
>> This sure sounds like a flamewar bait email?
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Aly S.P Dharshi wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://sql-info.de/postgresql/postgres-gotchas.html
>>> Any comments from folks on the list ?
>>> Cheers,
>>> Aly.
>>> -- Aly S.P Dharshi
>>> aly.dharshi@telus.net
>>>
>>>     "A good speech is like a good dress
>>>      that's short enough to be interesting
>>>      and long enough to cover the subject"
>>> ---------------------------(end of  
>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>>>      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>>>      match
>>>
>>
>> Gavin M. Roy
>> 800 Pound Gorilla
>> gmr@ehpg.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Aly S.P Dharshi
> aly.dharshi@telus.net
>
>      "A good speech is like a good dress
>       that's short enough to be interesting
>       and long enough to cover the subject"
>