Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
> On 2021-Feb-05, Mark Rofail wrote:
> > I disagree -- I think we should get the second patch in, and consider it
> > > a requisite for the other one.
> >
> > I just want to make sure I got your last message right. We should work on
> > adding the <<@ and @>> operators and their GIN logic as a separate patch
> > then submit the FKARRAY as a future patch?
>
> Well, *I* think it makes sense to do it that way. I said so three years
> ago :-)
> https://postgr.es/m/20180410135917.odjh5coa4cjatz5v@alvherre.pgsql
>
> > So basically reverse the order of the patches.
>
> Yeah.
I tend to agree with Alvaro on this, that getting the operators in first
makes more sense.
> Thanks a lot for your persistence, by the way.
+100
Hopefully we'll get this in during this cycle and perhaps then you'll
work on something else? :D Great to see a GSoC student continue to work
with the community years after the GSoC they participated in. If you'd
be interested in being a mentor for this upcoming GSoC season, please
let me know!
Thanks!
Stephen