On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 at 5:14 pm, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
If I am right my recommendation for getting this patch in is to initially skip the new operators and go back to the version of the patch which uses @>.
We really need an initial patch to get accepted and postpone anything that won't affect the core mechanics of the patch.
So yes, I move towards delaying the introduction of @>> to the patch.