Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK 
> with it.  It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal 
> with the recursive dependency problem.

Then what is the point of having it in CVS?  Other then to make are tar 
ball bigger?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664