Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Robert Treat wrote:

>
>Is telling the rpm maintainers to go fix their rpm's an option?  As has
>been hashed out before, the only thing that makes plphp different from
>other pl's is that some of the current packagers are taking shortcuts
>with the packaging scripts which introduces dependency issues. IMHO what
>is included in the postgresql cvs and what is included in the main
>tarball for postgresql should not be dictated by outside packagers. 
>
>
>
>  
>

That wasn't my understanding of the previous discussion. Does not php 
require pg client support configured in at build time?

cheers

andrew