Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Дата
Msg-id 8772.1115131383@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Montag, 2. Mai 2005 20:14 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
>> I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK
>> with it.  It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal
>> with the recursive dependency problem.

> How will a "separate compile stage" work for actually building, say, RPM or 
> Debian packages?  The only way I can see is wrapping up the PostgreSQL 
> distribution tarball a second time as a "plphp" source package and build from
> there, which seems quite weird.

I think the idea is that plphp would be in our CVS, but would not be
shipped as part of the main tarball, rather as its own separate tarball.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze
Следующее
От: "Dave Held"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1