Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Дата
Msg-id 200505031840.18267.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Not really that ugly. It is just an extra compile step. Besides
> you don't have to package it just because it is in the Tarball.

Since you keep raising that point: Not packaging something is not a 
valid solution to something being hard to package.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Schaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: distributed database