Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>>Not really that ugly. It is just an extra compile step. Besides
>>you don't have to package it just because it is in the Tarball.
> 
> 
> Since you keep raising that point: Not packaging something is not a 
> valid solution to something being hard to package.

Except that I don't consider it difficult. I do it all the time, it can 
be easily scripted.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/