Re: [HACKERS] LONG
От
wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] LONG
Дата
Msg-id
m11xGwt-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] LONG (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: [HACKERS] LONG "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: [HACKERS] LONG "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
RE: [HACKERS] LONG "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
RE: [HACKERS] LONG "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
RE: [HACKERS] LONG "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] LONG Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I disagree. By moving to another table, we don't have non-standard
> tuples in the main table. We can create normal tuples in the long*
> table, of identical format, and access them just like normal tuples.
> Having special long tuples in the main table that don't follow the
> format of the other tuples it a certain mess. The long* tables also
> move the long data out of the main table so it is not accessed in
> sequential scans. Why keep them in the main table?
More ugly and complicated (especially for VACUUM) seems to
me, the we need an index on these nonstandard tuples, that
doesn't see the standard ones, while the regular indices
ignore the new long tuples. At least if we want to delay
reading of long values until they're explicitly requested.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления