Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Дата
Msg-id
7784.1481221687@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Robert Haas  writes:
> Maybe it would help for Jeff to use elog_node_display() to the nodes
> that are causing the problem - e.g. outerpathkeys and innerpathkeys
> and best_path->path_mergeclauses, or just best_path - at the point
> where the error is thrown. That might give us enough information to
> see what's broken.

I'll be astonished if that's sufficient evidence.  We already know that
the problem is that the input path doesn't claim to be sorted in a way
that would match the merge clauses, but that doesn't tell us how such
a path came to be generated (or, if it wasn't intentionally done, where
the data structure got clobbered later).

It's possible that setting a breakpoint at create_mergejoin_path and
capturing stack traces for all calls would yield usable insight.  But
there are likely to be lots of calls if this is an 8-way join query,
and probably only a few are wrong.

I'd much rather have a test case than try to debug this remotely.
Bandwidth too low.
		regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
FAQ