Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Looks OK to me.  Would it be worth annotating the added regression test
>> case with a comment that this once caused EPQ-related planning problems?

> I tend to think somebody who is curious about the origin of any
> particular test can just use 'git blame' and/or 'git log -Gwhatever'
> to figure out which commits added it, and that therefore it's not
> worth including that in the comment explicitly.  But I don't care
> deeply.

It's debatable perhaps -- I tend to err in the other direction.
But likewise, I don't care deeply.  Just push it ...

            regards, tom lane