Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

(2018/01/12 10:41), Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>  wrote:
>>> Now, if you're still super-concerned about this breaking something, we
>>> could commit it only to master, where it will have 9 months to bake
>>> before it gets released.  I think that's overly conservative, but I
>>> think it's still better than waiting for the rewrite you'd like to see
>>> happen.  We don't know when or if anyone is going to undertake that,
>>> and if we wait, we may easing release a v11 that's got the same defect
>>> as v9.6 and now v10.  And I don't see that we lose much by committing
>>> this now even if that rewrite does happen in time for v11.  Ripping
>>> out CreateLocalJoinPath() won't be any harder than ripping out
>>> GetExistingLocalJoinPath().
>>
>> Agreed.  Attached is an rebased version which moved the new fields in
>> JoinPathExtraData to the end of that struct.
>
> FYI this doesn't compile anymore, because initial_cost_hashjoin() and
> create_hashjoin_path() changed in master.

Thank you for letting me know about that!  Here is an updated version.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita