(2018/01/31 4:56), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It looks like Etsuro-san's proposed patch locks down the choice of
>> plan more tightly, which is probably a reasonable answer.
>
> OK, committed. I added a comment along the lines you suggested
> previously, since this no longer seems like a generic test that
> happens to involve a bunch of merge joins.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita