On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It looks like Etsuro-san's proposed patch locks down the choice of
> plan more tightly, which is probably a reasonable answer.
OK, committed. I added a comment along the lines you suggested
previously, since this no longer seems like a generic test that
happens to involve a bunch of merge joins.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company