Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> We'd definitely need to do things that way in 9.6.  I'm not quite sure
>> whether it's too late to adopt the clean solution in v10.

> It probably is now.  Are you still planning to do something about this patch?

It's still on my list, but I didn't get to it during the CF.
        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers