Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ-UT9_RNty4sAQDxfxnxV2z4vYfhxbhWKN++ZXPQWAJQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> I rebased the patch to HEAD.  PFA a new version of the patch.
>
>> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
>> initially.  Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?
>
> I will, but probably not for a week or so.  Going eclipse-chasing.

Good luck:
https://xkcd.com/1876/
And enjoy:
https://xkcd.com/1877/
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr
Следующее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr