Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ryan Murphy
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Дата
Msg-id 20170905044336.18925.22634.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
Implements feature:       not tested
Spec compliant:           not tested
Documentation:            not tested

This feature is obviously a pretty deep cut, and I don't understand the JOIN system enough to comment on whether the
codeis correct.  I did not see any issues when glancing through the patch.
 

I ran "make check", "make installcheck" and "make installcheck-world" and had ALMOST no problems:  I marked it Tested
andPassed because the only issue I had was a recurring issue I've had with "make installcheck-world" which I think is
unrelated:

*** path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/connect-test5.stderr 2017-02-14 09:22:25.000000000 -0600
--- path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/results/connect-test5.stderr  2017-09-04 23:31:50.000000000 -0500
***************
*** 36,42 **** [NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000 [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT>
port<DEFAULT>  for user regress_ecpg_user2 [NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000
 
! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL:  database "regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist
...

But this still Needs Review by someone who knows the JOIN system better.

Best,
Ryan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Следующее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order