Re: SCSI vs SATA

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Stone
Тема Re: SCSI vs SATA
Дата
Msg-id 20070406114336.GD4374@mathom.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: SCSI vs SATA
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:00:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
>the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
>fraction of infant mortality.  The savings in return processing and
>customer goodwill would surely justify the electricity they'd use.

Wouldn't help if the reason for the infant mortality is bad handling
between the factory and the rack. One thing that I did question in the
CMU study was the lack of infant mortality--I've definately observed it,
but it might just be that my UPS guy is clumsier than theirs.

Mike Stone

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Stone
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Следующее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SCSI vs SATA