Re: SCSI vs SATA
| От | Michael Stone |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070406114336.GD4374@mathom.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs SATA
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:00:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in >the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large >fraction of infant mortality. The savings in return processing and >customer goodwill would surely justify the electricity they'd use. Wouldn't help if the reason for the infant mortality is bad handling between the factory and the rack. One thing that I did question in the CMU study was the lack of infant mortality--I've definately observed it, but it might just be that my UPS guy is clumsier than theirs. Mike Stone
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: