Re: SCSI vs SATA
| От | jason@ohloh.net |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 74022AFF-0CB6-421C-B2D7-2A88A93C9604@ohloh.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs SATA
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Arjen van der Meijden wrote: > If you don't care about such things, it may actually be possible to > build a similar set-up as your SATA-system with 12 or 16 15k rpm > SAS disks or 10k WD Raptor disks. For the sata-solution you can > also consider a 24-port Areca card. fwiw, I've had horrible experiences with areca drivers on linux. I've found them to be unreliable when used with dual AMD64 processors 4+ GB of ram. I've tried kernels 2.16 up to 2.19... intermittent yet inevitable ext3 corruptions. 3ware cards, on the other hand, have been rock solid. -jay
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: