Re: SCSI vs SATA
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4613C954.8050203@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SCSI vs SATA
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> difference. OTOH, the SCSI discs were way less reliable than the SATA
> discs, that might have been bad luck.
Probably bad luck. I find that SCSI is very reliable, but I don't find
it any more reliable than SATA. That is assuming correct ventilation etc...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: