Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

On 07/29/2018 01:28 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Thomas Munro
>  wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Tomas Vondra
>>  wrote:
>>> It's always 0/-0 difference, and it's limited to power machines. I'll
>>> try to get access to such system and see what's wrong.
>>
>> This is suspicious:
>>
>>         /* on some platforms, the preceding expression tends to produce -0 */
>>         if (line->C == 0.0)
>>             line->C = 0.0;
> 
> I mean, it's suspiciously absent from the new line_construct()
> function.  It was introduced here:
> 
> commit 43fe90f66a0b200f6c32507428349afb45f661ca
> Author: Tom Lane 
> Date:   Fri Oct 25 15:55:15 2013 -0400
> 
>     Suppress -0 in the C field of lines computed by line_construct_pts().
> 
>     It's not entirely clear why some PPC machines are generating -0 here, since
>     the underlying computation should be exactly 0 - 0.  Perhaps there's some
>     wider-than-nominal-precision calculations happening?  Anyway, the best way
>     to avoid platform-dependent results seems to be to explicitly reset -0 to
>     regular zero.
> 

Hmm, I see. I think adding it to the else branch should do the trick,
then, I guess. But I'd be much happier if I could test it somewhere
before the commit.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services