Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com> writes:
>> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
>> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
>> file, won't it fail on some other machines?

> I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}().  I
> dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken.  I
> get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.

I'll bet a good deal of money that you'll find that does not hold
true across the whole buildfarm.

            regards, tom lane