Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Дата
Msg-id 87846de5-9dbe-85d9-96c3-d01bd6249d37@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/17/2018 08:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com> writes:
>>> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
>>> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
>>> file, won't it fail on some other machines?
> 
>> I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}().  I
>> dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken.  I
>> get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.
> 
> I'll bet a good deal of money that you'll find that does not hold
> true across the whole buildfarm.
> 

Hmm, yeah. Based on past experience, the powerpc machines are likely to
stumble on this.

FWIW my understanding is that these failures actually happen in new
tests, it's not an issue introduced by this patch series.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept
Следующее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materializedviews