Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

On 08/17/2018 08:24 PM, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
>> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
>> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
>> file, won't it fail on some other machines?
> 
> I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}().  I
> dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken.  I
> get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.
> 

OK, that explains is. I won't have time to get this committed before CF
2018-09, but I'll pick it up in September.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services