At Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:25:30 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote in
<CA+TgmoYgg8=m9+Y54Az1r+KBpMuiEOZM_DLDF04jMP4twGR3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > /* don't merge the following same functions with different types
> > into single macros so that double evaluation won't happen */
> >
> > Is it still too verbose?
>
> Personally, I don't think such a comment has much value, but I am not
> going to spend a lot of time arguing about it. It's really up to the
> eventual committer to decide, and that probably won't be me in this
> case. My knowledge of the geometric types isn't great, and I am a tad
> busy breaking^Wimproving things I do understand.
Ok, I agree with you.
# Though it is not a issue of geometric types :p
I'll withdrow the comment. Maybe someone notices of that when
reviewing such a patch.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers