Robert Treat wrote:
> > > Dare I mention it, but we have a history of listing people who contribute
> > > code for each release, perhaps we should add a "sponsors" section in the
> > > release notes, and include a list of every company who sponsors a feature
> > > for that release (based on designation of the developer who did the
> > > work).
> >
> > We mention companies in the press release; having them in the release
> > notes seems like advertizing, and advertizing that will remain in the
> > release notes for years and years (which is probably bad).
> >
>
> Well, technically it is advertising, but I don't see why it is necessarily
> bad. Developer contributions live on in old release notes for many years even
> once the developer stops contributing, why not with companies? Or to put it
> another way, would it be so bad if people looking in the 7.3 release notes
> saw Great Bridge listed as a corporate sponsor for that release?
In my opinion, for individuals, it is recognition; for companies it is
advertizing. I think company names would be ugly after a while. And
what do you do for people who work and are sponsored by companies? Put
both the company name and author? Frankly I would rather remove all the
names from the release notes before making them longer with both.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +