On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 11:02 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 17:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 06:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities
> > > >
> > > > Good
> > > >
> > > > > unless necessary.
> > > >
> > > > That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
> > >
> > > What does "accept" mean above? Are you the sole acceptor for this
> > > feature? That is surprising to me.
> > >
> > > You can say you would vote against it but your wording above seems
> > > overly controlling.
> >
> > I would hope my words carry the same weight as others when people speak
> > of what can and cannot be included, when backed by reasonable and
> > logical technical reasons.
> >
> > Some things are important, some not, and I've done my best to use words
> > that indicate my views on that.
>
> I think you need to work on improving your word choice then.
I vote against this proposal.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support