Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1235516325.16176.257.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 16:52 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I didn't think I had proposed any such thing, although maybe I'm just > not remembering. I'm pretty confused as to what the current thread is > all about. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg00978.php I don't think anyone who argued in favour of removal of existing system was aware that we'd lose anything as a result. I think everybody supports the easier-if-possible sentiment that Heikki was expressing; I just don't want to let that be seen as agreement to remove, by default, at a later time. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: