Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:34 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>   
>> Well VLDB is like 2% of what we need. 
>>     
>
> I am against removing an existing capability that is important to some
> users. We shouldn't need to debate the exact percentage of users that
> would be affected, or how to count them.
>
>   

Perhaps so, but I would hope you would support what Heikki and others 
have been talking about as an option for replication. The 2% shouldn't 
hold back the remaining 98%.

cheers

andrew