Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-18 13:12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Indeed.  In this case, since the patch in question is one that
>> improves/simplifies a patch that's already in the current commitfest,
>> I'm going to go ahead and push it.  If you want to call a vote on
>> revoking my commit bit, go right ahead.
>
> Seriously? In my opinion it has to be possible to doubt whether a patch
> should be committed in certain release without it being interpreted as a
> personal attack.

+1


-- 
Peter Geoghegan