Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQXWex2yPGaHzmcDjCEbHMBfm0wQ77+hXH6gBcmKeiw6w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Ответы Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 11:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we want to have this in src/test/modules or src/bin/pg_dump/t?
>>
>>
>> Are we testing pg_dump here, or are we testing extensions?  If the
>> former, src/bin/pg_dump/t seems best.

All the tests are using pg_dump, but it is testing dumpable tables in
an extension. At this point I am not sure which one is better honestly
X/. Putting it in pg_dump/t will require two lines in the make target
prove_check such as modules in this path are installed as well, and
the argument against having it in src/test/modules is that it would
bloat it in the future if we do the same for all binaries,
particularly if we have multiple modules for each one.

> I think that's the crux of the disagreement :-).

Yep.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Removing SSL renegotiation (Was: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failing assertions in indxpath.c, placeholder.c and brin_minmax.c